" /> A Day In The Journey: January 2007 Archives

« December 2006 | Main | February 2007 »

January 24, 2007

with such people as these

I recently read, for the first time in my life (yes, I'm a bad scholar), Aldous Huxley's Brave New World Frankly, it's one of the best written novels I've ever read. I've read Orwell. I certainly see the dangers of the world of which he warns us. I can certainly see the areas where it can, and probably is, creeping toward us in the sensuous guise of socialsim/communism. I've read Bradbury. I can see the impending dangers of the world he fears where reading is dangerous because we no longer understand it, and we fear the seditious properties of what we don't understand. Huxley seems to wrap it all into a package that ominously reflects social trends that creep toward us even now: the loss of the value of an individual, the constant business and consumer glut, the uselessness of monogamous love and family. It's book well worth the read if you haven't read it yet.

And now, for the purpose of intriguing you, some quotations:

Strange to think that even in Our Ford's day most games were played without more apparatus than a ball or two and a few sticks adn perhaps a bit of netting. Imaging the folloy of allowing people to play elaborate games which do nothing whatever to increase consumption. (31)

Feeling lurks in that interval of time between desire and its consumation. (44)

Our ancestors were so stupid and short-sighted that when the first reformers came along an offered to deliver them from those horrible emotions, they wouldn't have anything to do with them. (45)

It's not enough for the phrases to be good; what you make with them ought to be good too. (69)

...after all, what is an individual?....We can make a new one with the greatest ease--as many as we like. Unorthodoxy threatens more than the life of a mere individual; it strikes at Society itself. Yes, at Society itself. (148)

Have I piqued your interest? I hope so.


Huxley, Aldous. Brave New World. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2006.

January 19, 2007

lame-o

Yesterday, on my way to work, I was listening to K-LOVE. (Yes, I listen to K-LOVE on the way to work. "Positive" and "encouraging" is good in the morning for me; plus, I would rather hear music than vapid attempts at witty banter all morning. Ok, all 30 minutes.) Anyway, back to my story. So, they played a Selah cover of Josh Groban's "You Raise Me Up." Yes. Now, don't get me wrong--it sounded really good. It wasn't a cheesy, dippy cover. Selah has some talent, and their voices worked very well for the song. Here's my issue: they sang it to the exact, same musical track. I kid you not. It was like they just deleted Groban's voice and put their voices in instead. I was fairly baffled. The only difference between to two songs is the performer. So apparently, any old vague song can be put on K-LOVE, but only if a "Christian" artist is singing it. Don't take me the wrong way on this--I'm not saying that's what I think. Frankly, I think they should have played the Josh Groban version. What's wrong with his? Is it somehow more spiritual if we know for sure that the performer is talking about God in the song because they have the label "Christian" next to their group name? I just found it really bizarre and kind of lame. What do you think?

January 17, 2007

poem

Haunting spirits hold me back,
inflicting spectral pain as I try to step.
Fear creeps through me.
I wonder, "Will this step be a mistake?"
The spirits say, "Yes."
One spirit holds more sway than the others.
This spirit mocks my initiative:
You'll fall;
You'll lose;
You'll give your heart to one who isn't right;
You'll never find someone quite like me;
You'll never be satisfied.
My heart quakes in response.
What if this spectre, all the spectres, speaks truth?
Is my fear a part of who I am?
Or is it only the voices of haunting?
Why can't I turn the voices away?
Instead, I let myself pause
on the verge of each step,
inundated by the haunting spectral pain.

January 03, 2007

suggestions, suggestions

I am working on a story/book right now about a princess named Elsadore. She's 7. She's very curious, and in the story she will discover something that she must investigate because she is so so curious. And it will get her into trouble. But of course, everything will be okay in the end. And I've written a very nice start to the story in which Elsadore gets into some trouble by following a frog away from her lessons and into the royal pond. Here's my problem: I can't think of anything for her discover that's not either really ridiculous or completely out of character for the story. It isn't a magical story. It isn't a very silly story. It's a charming story. So I am shamelessly asking for suggestions. If you were a very curious, seven-year-old who prefers following frogs to listening to Tutor, what would you discover that would lead you deeply into mysteriousness? Or would you overhear something and conjur a wild and off-base interpretation of it? What do you all have to offer to my dear little Elsadore?