Main

February 06, 2007

The phenomenon we call “faery tale”

Why do faery tales appeal to us? Why do adults still remain fascinated by the stories they were told as children? Why do we continue to revisit them, both in their original forms and in amended and modernized forms?

Knowing many of those who read this blog personally, I feel fairly safe in hazarding, like several notable writers of both the present and past, that they appeal to us because the shadow the Great Story. They haunt us because they remind us that we are part of a Faery Tale ourselves. They offer us reminders of the hope before us. They pierce us with the possibilities that Hope is and the Hope finds us when we need it. But for all their hope, their joy, their haunting, faery tales are so often filled with a brutal edge. But then, life itself is filled with many brutal edges.

Why do ponder this? Because I am so impressed with a new faery tale.

Continue reading "The phenomenon we call “faery tale”" »

August 08, 2006

the gauntlet has been taken up

So I've been tossed the challenge by Jesse G.

1. One book that changed your life: Till We Have Faces by C.S. Lewis

2. One book that you’ve read more than once: Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte

3. One book you’d want on a desert island: The Book of Images by Rainer Maria Rilke

4. One book that made you laugh: By the Light of the Moon by Dean Koontz

5. One book that made you cry: The House of Mirth by Edith Wharton

6. One book that you wish had been written: How to be courageous in confusing situations

7. One book that you wish had never been written: Democracy and Education by John Dewey

8. One book you’re currently reading: Eragon by Christpher Paolini

9. One book you’ve been meaning to read: The Decameron by Boccaccio

10. Now tag five people: Cooper, Marlo (sorry, dear, i'm running out of other options), Kinsey, Kylie, and Rachel M.

Of course, anyone may take up the gauntlet, but these five have been specifically challenged and tasked to take it up. Refuse it at your own peril.

December 10, 2005

the beauty of narnia

When I was a little girl--I guess around 6, because my parents were re-married by then--my dad read The Chronicles of Narnia to me at bedtimes. I adored them. Up until my teen years, we read every night he was home, travelling through all kinds of books: Little House on the Prarie, The Screwtape Letters, even The Law by Bastiat. Of all the books we read my favourite all my life has been The Chronicles. Since that time, I've read them quite a few more times. (Yes, I am one of those that reads books more than one time.) It was so amazing to think of another world at your fingertips so full of beauty and adventure--and you could never quite tell when you might stumble upon it. Of course, Lewis touches deep spiritual and metaphysical chords in his series as well, but ultimately, the stories are about beautiful adventures. I was in love with that world.
I just got back from seeing The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe with my sister. Of course, this isn't the first one of its kind--there is an animated one, and a fairly decent version released by BBC a number of years ago--I've seen the others. They're alright. This movie is what was playing in my head when I read the books. I can't even think of a better compliment to give. I was a child again, discovering Narnia all over. I was a little afraid at one point that they'd skipped the most amazing line--"He's not a tame lion, you know." "No. But He's good."--but lo and behold, there it was. I even truly enjoyed the addition at the beginning. To a generation so removed from WWII, it added a good deal of context to the story (and reminded me again what troopers the British are). The cast was excellent. Unlike the BBC girl, this Lucy doesn't whine. You fall in love with her. Peter is the resolute oldest son trying to take the place of his father. Susan captured well the young girl trying to be reasonable and important, but still really a girl. And Edmund. Watching him, you can really see him drawn into the net by his petulance--at each step becoming more angry and ill-tempered. His redemption is a relief because you do like him despite the attitudinal mistakes he makes. This movie is everything you want it to be, and very well. It is wonderful. Now I think I'll go read the book again.

November 26, 2005

Kurt Vonnegut is a wacko.

I had to post this. I have to give credit for finding the story to someone else [ Babalu Blog].
Really, whatever your position on war in general or the War on Terror, Vonnegut's comments are just beyond the pale.

US author lauds suicide bombers
David Nason, New York correspondent
19 Nov 2005

ONE of the greatest living US writers has praised terrorists as "very brave people" and used drug culture slang to describe the "amazing high" suicide bombers must feel before blowing themselves up.

Kurt Vonnegut, author of the 1969 anti-war classic Slaughterhouse Five, made the provocative remarks during an interview in New York for his new book, Man Without a Country, a collection of writings critical of US President George W. Bush.

Vonnegut, 83, has been a strong opponent of Mr Bush and the US-led war in Iraq, but until now has stopped short of defending terrorism.

But in discussing his views with The Weekend Australian, Vonnegut said it was "sweet and honourable" to die for what you believe in, and rejected the idea that terrorists were motivated by twisted religious beliefs.

"They are dying for their own self-respect," he said. "It's a terrible thing to deprive someone of their self-respect. It's like your culture is nothing, your race is nothing, you're nothing."

Asked if he thought of terrorists as soldiers, Vonnegut, a decorated World War II veteran, said: "I regard them as very brave people, yes."

He equated the actions of suicide bombers with US president Harry Truman's 1945 decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima.

On the Iraq war, he said: "What George Bush and his gang did not realise was that people fight back."

Vonnegut suggested suicide bombers must feel an "amazing high". He said: "You would know death is going to be painless, so the anticipation - it must be an amazing high."

Vonnegut's comments are sharply at odds with his reputation as a peace activist and his distinguished war service. He served in the US 106th Division and was captured by German forces at the Battle of the Bulge.

Taken to Dresden and held with other POWs in a disused abattoir, Vonnegut witnessed the appalling events of February 13-14, 1945, when 800 RAF Lancaster bombers firebombed the city, killing an estimated 100,000 civilians.

The experience inspired his book Slaughterhouse Five - the title of the novel coming from the barracks he was assigned in the POW camp. The book became an international bestseller and made Vonnegut a luminary of the US literary left.

But since Mr Bush was elected, Vonnegut's criticisms of US policy have become more and more impassioned.

In 2002, he was widely criticised for saying there was too much talk about the 9/11 attacks and not enough about "the crooks on Wall Street and in big corporations", whose conduct had been more destructive.

The following year he wrote that the US was hated around the world "because our corporations have been the principal deliverers and imposers of new technologies and economic schemes that have wrecked the self-respect, the cultures of men, women and children in so many other societies".

But Vonnegut's latest comments are likely to make many people wonder if old age has finally caught up with a grand old man of American letters.

© The Australian

(H/T Mike Pancier)

November 16, 2005

which book?

I read this very interesting article on National Review Online that I thought I would share. I know there is a debate going about which Narnia book should be read first. Being older than the re-numbered additions, I read The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe first. In the several times that I have read the series since, I have read it both ways--I prefer still to read The Lion... first. Mr. Miller makes a strong, reasonable argument in favor of the original first novel. It's worth the read.


Continue reading "which book?" »